Click to Enlarge
The letter that Tom Maloney refers to in the Oct 27, 2008 AGM Minutes
Tom Maloney in his Minutes of the Oct 27, 2008 Annual Meeting does not dispute the contents of this letter. He never tried to refute the facts stated in the letter (referred to in Tom Maloney's 10/27/08 Minutes) because he can not as they are 100% true. Dan Rosen till this day, still refuses to disclose what he bought with the Association's $3,030 check. Tom Maloney refused to answer why he didn't disclose to the Association what the police or the Prosecutor's office were telling him or even that the Association had been served with a Grand Jury subpoena, apparently Tom doesn't think the Association has a right to know. Tom, like Dan, refused to answer what was purchased with this $3,030.00 check Dan Rosen wrote to himself from the Association's bank account. If this $3,030 check was used for Association's legitimate business, why doesn't Dan Rosen or lawyer Tom Maloney simply explain what the money was used for?
At the 10/27/08 annual meeting, Tom Maloney answered "yes" when asked if he is representing Dan Rosen. The obvious question arises: When he conducts Association business as its Secretary and Board member is he putting the interests of the Association first or Dan Rosen?
No comments:
Post a Comment